Staggering the MetadataProvider reloadInterval
Scott Klawitter
sklawitter at ebsco.com
Tue Oct 25 21:22:22 BST 2011
Thanks for the reply Scott,
I should have mentioned that the MetadataProvider type="Chaining".
I was referring to staggering the reloadInterval for each chained
MetadataProvider.
The reason: Federations like the UKfederation take a long time to
download the metadata. I wasn't sure if this had an effect on
performance of the SP processing requests.
<MetadataProvider type="Chaining">
<MetadataProvider type="XML"
uri="https://federationa.com/metadata.xml"
backingFilePath="
prod-country1-federationa-metadata.xml "
reloadInterval="7200">
</MetadataProvider>
<MetadataProvider type="XML"
uri="https://federationb.com/metadata.php"
backingFilePath="prod-country2-federationb-metadata.xml"
reloadInterval="180000">
</MetadataProvider>
</MetadataProvider>
Is there a suggested reloadInterval value to use for an SP?
Thank you,
- Scott K
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at shibboleth.net [mailto:users-bounces at shibboleth.net]
On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:59 PM
To: users at shibboleth.net
Subject: Re: Staggering the MetadataProvider reloadInterval
On 10/25/11 3:46 PM, "Scott Klawitter" <sklawitter at ebsco.com> wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a performance gain by staggering the
>MetadataProvider reloadInterval in the shibboleth2.xml configuration
file.
Staggering it against what?
>
>What value is a standard best practice for an SP.
The reload interval is a function of the source of the metadata and how
often you expect it to change. The cost of checking is near zero anyway
as long as the server returns a 304 when it should.
-- Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
More information about the users
mailing list