Dynamic Metadata and Artifacts

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/9/17, 11:48 AM, "dev on behalf of Tom Scavo" <dev-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of trscavo at gmail.com> wrote:

> That's doable for SAML V1.1 Type 0x0001 Artifacts and SAML V2.0 Type
> 0x0004 Artifacts but not SAML V1.1 Type 0x0002 Artifacts. I claim the
> latter is not possible without a major overhaul of the MDQ spec (which
> no one is willing to embrace).

Once the value is not a hash, it is of no distinction to the client or server whether it's a URL or a ham sandwhich if the server is willing to index it and resolve it, so it is entirely possible. It's down to wording. Whether it's ugly or not is a different question.

-- Scott