R4481 Checkstyle Parameter Rename Issue

[Cantor, Scott]

> For the rest, I'm with Scott that this is a much better way to proceed - putting
> the work on our shoulders not the deployers.  Also I now understand why
> the java classes needed to be summoned up with parameter numbers for
> constructors.

Me too, java.lang.String specifically.

> I'm assuming that we will not move off debug builds in V3 (save perhaps for a
> test).  But is there any reason not to do it for V4?  Shall I pop in a V4 case?

Seems likely, but I would defer to the Java experts.

-- Scott