R4481 Checkstyle Parameter Rename Issue

[Rod Widdowson]

> My suggestion to use a custom annotation and custom implementation of ParameterNameDiscoverer

I must admit that’s what I thought we had been talking about which is why I got confused about Java8.

For the rest, I'm with Scott that this is a much better way to proceed - putting the work on our shoulders not the deployers.  Also I now understand why the java classes needed to be summoned up with parameter numbers for constructors.

I'm assuming that we will not move off debug builds in V3 (save perhaps for a test).  But is there any reason not to do it for V4?  Shall I pop in a V4 case?