Reconsider moving jetty-base out of idp-distribution ?
Tom Zeller
tzeller at dragonacea.biz
Thu Jul 23 12:27:55 EDT 2015
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Rod Widdowson <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
> The last time we had this confusion we decided to make the base file less
> visible. We haven't been able to get that change released yet and so I'd
> argue that the fact that people are still have problems is not surprising.
Oh, right.
> So my question back is whether we want to bite this off right now? And if
> not, when (after 3.2 would be my suggestion).
Not sure, and your suggestion seems fine to me.
Restating what I am wanting : (1) to make sure we version jetty-base
and jetty.version (in the POM) together properly, and less importantly
(2) include jetty-distribution as a dependency in the stack (in order
to manage dependencies in Nexus).
Right now, bumping jetty.version in the parent POM means we bump
everything (I think), so I am wondering if we need to move
jetty.version down in the POM hierarchy. For example, if we need to
respond quickly to a Jetty fix.
More information about the dev
mailing list