Additional debug loggers ?

[Tom Zeller]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Brent Putman <putmanb at georgetown.edu> wrote:
> On 1/28/15 3:02 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>> Does anyone else have a strong opinion for or against?
>> +1 to using the class.
>
> If nobody else votes otherwise, that's probably what I'll do.

Okay, and if so I'll follow by using the class name for the startup
properties logger, so we'll go back to just protocol_message.
Apologies for the churn.