uApprove JP 2.5.0 released (Re: v3 consent to attribute release : required vs optional attrs ?)

[Cantor, Scott]

On 9/3/14, 11:57 PM, "Michael A Grady" <mgrady at unicon.net> wrote:
>
>Agree that working with Shib idPv3 will be critical. And I know that the
>PL team is already exploring that, as Michael Stroucken (with recent
>questions to this list) is part of that team.

Ah. Didn't know that was connected.

In any case, the point is that we have no documentation yet on how we
would expect this to happen, but we discussed it heavily on the last call,
including how serialization is meant to work. So that's where we'd have to
discuss it.

There is no call this week, FYI.

-- Scott