uApprove JP 2.5.0 released (Re: v3 consent to attribute release : required vs optional attrs ?)

[Michael A Grady]

On Sep 3, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Nate Klingenstein <ndk at internet2.edu> wrote:

> Mike, that's largely accurate and complete from where I sit.
> 
> The bigger concern is just that PrivacyLens was developed independently against a code base that is not going to be maintained in the time frame during which initial rollout would probably be envisioned.  We're just recommending that their future development work be against the v3 IdP and offering the dev call as a platform for synchronization of needs.  This is all to ensure that all these solutions could be viable without a lot of customization.

Agree that working with Shib idPv3 will be critical. And I know that the PL team is already exploring that, as Michael Stroucken (with recent questions to this list) is part of that team. Whether he is available to join the Dev call on Friday I don't know, but I'll be sure he knows about it.

--
Michael A. Grady
Senior IAM Consultant, Unicon, Inc.