version numbering inconsistency

[Cantor, Scott]

On 10/7/14, 10:05 AM, "Ian Young" <ian at iay.org.uk> wrote:
>
>Every time something like this happens, I find myself confused so I could
>be wrong about the above, but can I get confirmation that a version bump
>of one kind or another is required here?

Yeah. I would just call it 3.0-SNAP, it's not worth the time figuring out
whether 2.1 is possible IMHO.

-- Scott