Consent Wording

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/24/14, 5:28 PM, "Eric Goodman" <Eric.Goodman at ucop.edu> wrote:
>
>I haven't used it, but I've heard of at least one other project that 
>leverages "Crowdin" to manage the content of such translations:
>
>https://crowdin.com/
>
>Has a mechanism for you (developers) to register new messages needing 
>translation, etc. 

Thanks, we'll look at it.

>And I'd presume that the translations would be an add on, not necessarily 
>something ShibDev would support (other than creating the framework for 
>it).

That really depends on whether we're shipping the files, because it means 
we have to accept bug reports and go seek out new translations or 
complaints about the existing ones. English alone is a rathole of constant 
arguing about wording that's supposed to be a local decision anyway.

As soon as you change the wording in a meaningful way, the translations 
are wrong, and I'm just not sure how I feel about that, because people 
*should* change the wording. The only reason the wording wouldn't change 
for me is that I wrote most of it based on my deployment, but that's just 
a coincidental case.

-- Scott