DefaultRelyingParty and AnonymousRelyingParty

[Cantor, Scott]

On 3/11/14, 1:14 PM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>However I believe that I remember a discussion - possibly in a meeting
>since
>I can find no reference to it in the shib-dev archives - between Scott and
>Brent (I think) about the precise difference between these two situations
>and what we want to do (if anything) about continuing with this
>distinction.

We were talking about the concept of a requester ID, and whether that's
"mandatory" or not, and how that related to the Anonymous case. As Brent
noted, Anonymous today doesn't mean "no ID", it means we don't have
metadata for the ID.

My question was whether that assumption would always hold or not, but it
probably holds for SAML.

-- Scott