Hybrid Syntax in relying-party.xml

[Cantor, Scott]

On 7/13/14, 12:43 PM, "Rod Widdowson" <rdw at steadingsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>I just happened on this code again and it strikes me that we should either
>remove this support of document it.  I prefer the former, what do others
>feel?

I'd rather dump it, I really don't want to have to document a mix of
mechanisms. I really think we should formally deprecate the old syntax,
but we haven't explicitly decided that. Even if we don't, I don't want to
add features to it unless they're just simple properties.

-- Scott