idpv3 first look

Rod Widdowson rdw at steadingsoftware.com
Wed Jul 2 04:41:58 EDT 2014


> >I get a ton of these warnings
> >
> >16:43:38.623 - WARN
> >[net.shibboleth.idp.attribute.filter.spring.BaseFilterParser:139] -
> >Element 'PermitValueRule' did not contain an 'id' attribute.  Generated
> >id
>
>'/AttributeFilterPolicyGroup:CoreFilterPolicy/PermitValueRule:_5ba4f3ad3b3
> >8862fabf2c3a34489a7ec' will be used
> >
> >
> >Nobody ever complained before.  I agree that the elements don't have ids,
> >but, if your going to use a default, the WARN seems excessive.
> 
> If they stay WARN it will be because we decide to formally deprecate not
> including an ID, and then it would be appropriate. If we don't deprecated
> that, we'll turn down the level.

Yea, info sounds better.  One of the reasons why I added that line was that
further logging will use the name to disambiguate the error and the "line
noise" name won't help as much



More information about the dev mailing list