CAS Protocol Milestone

[Cantor, Scott]

On 8/19/14, 11:52 AM, "Ian Young" <ian at iay.org.uk> wrote:
>
>I know that there's a ton of history and therefore inertia here, but on
>the basis that there will always be new people being confused by this,
>should we consider actually adopting a new term (straw man: "unverified")
>and phasing out the use of "anonymous" ?

Certainly we could change the terminology within the API and in the
default config. We obviously can't change the legacy syntax, so
AnonymousRelyingParty would be mapped to the renamed slot.

I can look at that if people think it's worth changing. I sort of figured
it would confuse more than help to do it now, but I don't feel strongly.

-- Scott