Config layout

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/2/13, 4:13 AM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:

>> Or alternatively, we could have
>>
>> system/conf/
>> system/flows/
>> user/conf/
>> user/flows/
>
>I had been thinking similarly, but more like
>
>internal/conf/
>internal/flows/
>conf/
>flows/
>
>Although "system" is fine, maybe "private", maybe "impl", even
>"do-not-edit" :-)

I'm ok with that. I like "system" more than I liked "user", so dumping
"user" doesn't bother me. I thought about internal obviously, but I never
found the word to be very evocative of the intent, so system seemed more
accurate to me.

>That said, slashes (system/conf) or dashes (system-conf) are fine with
>me either way, but I think I prefer slashes because internal/conf and
>internal/flows are "hidden" under "internal".

Yes.

-- Scott