coding conventions : getUrl vs getURL

[Ian Young]

On 12 Mar 2013, at 02:39, "Cantor, Scott" <cantor.2 at osu.edu> wrote:

> Since you asked…

ditto

> I favor getURL

This is also my preference, although not a particularly strong one.

> I favor consistency, and I think we need to avoid project specific rules
> because for a period of time we may be moving code back and forth.

I agree.  The exception would perhaps be that I don't see any reason to spend a lot of time keeping the V2 code particularly consistent with wherever the V3 code ends up.  That's obviously a no-no for the public APIs in any case (e.g., XmlSecTool can't become XMLSecTool until a major version because "some people" (e.g., me) call that class directly.

	-- Ian



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4813 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/dev/attachments/20130312/b3380ece/attachment-0001.bin