opensaml 3.0-SNAPSHOT

[Cantor, Scott]

On 3/9/13 12:22 PM, "ben leinfelder" <leinfelder at nceas.ucsb.edu> wrote:

>Hi Tom+Scott,
>I appreciate the estimates. Probably the 'safe' thing for me to do is use
>the 2.5.1 release, even if it's a tad disheartening to move backwards.
>Luckily, refactoring wasn't a huge chore despite the extensive
>modularization you introduced in v3. I'll keep an eye out for a stable
>3.0 later in the year.

2.6.0 is due out in the not distant future, but you can move to that
without any changes.

-- Scott