svn.relative.location

[Tom Zeller]

> On 2/27/13 8:37 PM, Tom Zeller wrote:
>> I suggest <snip> changing the
>> <name> of idp-parent from "Shibboleth Identity Provider" to
>> "java-identity-provider",
>
> I don't personally think we should do that.  The <name> is supposed to
> be human-readable and is used in various places like report generation
> and so on.

Okay.

What do you think about renaming "java-identity-provider" to
"shib-identity-provider" ... would that make it better ?

I am not proposing this real seriously, just chatting.

> One of the things Chad had suggested (see the Nov 2012 thread) was just
> dumping svn.relative.location entirely.  If we want to go simple, then
> each multi-module parent could just point at the root of it's repo, each
> monolithic project would just point at it's root.  Wouldn't be as exact
> for the multi-module projects, but it wouldn't be the end of the world
> if we only use it in site generation (if ever).

I think we agree on dropping svn.relative.location.

So we would move the <scm> block to the appropriate project level,
e.g. idp-parent or java-support ?