OpenSAML Velocity templates for POST etc. responses
Grady, Michael Allen
m-grady at illinois.edu
Wed Feb 20 12:07:53 EST 2013
On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
> On 2/20/13 10:45 AM, "Michael A Grady" <mgrady at unicon.net> wrote:
>>
>> That would be ok (the filenames changing), as long as they retain
>> different names and the name has anything to do with the "action/event"
>> it is associated with (e.g. SAML2 POST, SAML1 POST, etc.). This "name"
>> isn't important enough to be worth creating yet another configuration
>> option for, it just provides one more way to potentially
>> differentiate/sort the results.
>
> It wouldn't be a new option, it's an existing piece of data on the message
> encoder (the binding is there as a property).
So you are saying that there is a existing element available to, for example, "saml2/binding/encoding/HTTPPostEncoder.java", that would identify the binding type and its just a matter of adding that to the template's Context to have it available?
>
> -- Scott
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to dev-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net
--
Michael A. Grady
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (retired)
217-721-3890
More information about the dev
mailing list