OpenSAML Velocity templates for POST etc. responses

[Cantor, Scott]

On 2/20/13 10:45 AM, "Michael A Grady" <mgrady at unicon.net> wrote:
>
>That would be ok (the filenames changing), as long as they retain
>different names and the name has anything to do with the "action/event"
>it is associated with (e.g. SAML2 POST, SAML1 POST, etc.). This "name"
>isn't important enough to be worth creating yet another configuration
>option for, it just provides one more way to potentially
>differentiate/sort the results.

It wouldn't be a new option, it's an existing piece of data on the message
encoder (the binding is there as a property).

-- Scott