SVNAdaptor from Tigris

[Cantor, Scott]

On 12/30/13, 3:49 PM, "Tom Zeller" <tzeller at dragonacea.biz> wrote:
>
>When we talked I was thinking about "Coping with Sun JARs" [1], but
>"provided" really means provided by the JDK or container which is not
>exactly our use case.

I assumed it meant "provided by not us", but ok.

>Other folks have dealt with the SVNkit license as well [2] [3].

[2] is what I often see at ASF, good discussion and then no answer.

(I note the paranoia about LGPL there also, and still can't understand
why.)

>Just signaling that I might very well be wrong, and marking the
>dependency as optional and omitting from the assembly may be the
>correct path, as we discussed.

Fine with either, since the outcome seems to be identical.

-- Scott