Missing SOAP header in ECP response

Brent Putman putmanb at georgetown.edu
Thu Dec 13 00:11:39 EST 2012


On 12/12/12 6:37 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>
> I was referring mainly to the encoder stuff, which I thought we had left
> somewhat in flux. My point I guess was that I wouldn't spend a lot of time
> trying to use more than the XML processing code because my guess was it
> would be changing in the future more than the other pieces.


It's true that in v3, the encoders/decoders and message handling in
general is completely different.  But I think the server-side SOAP
decoder/encoder stuff that's in v2 openws works ok, and I know that is
what we used in the delegation work, so it is at least somewhat tested. 
I wouldn't really call it in flux at this point.  Although maybe you are
referring to something else.


>
> Meanwhile those other Java implementations are specifically ECP clients so
> if somebody is trying to write one, that seems like the obvious thing to
> use or worst case copy from.

Sure, for the SOAP client side from a more mature example is probably a
better starting point.




More information about the dev mailing list