Dependencies / compatibility for 2.5 SP

[Cantor, Scott]

On 11/17/11 10:45 AM, "Christopher Bongaarts" <cab at umn.edu> wrote:
>
>So that seems to suggest that the dependent libraries (opensaml,
>xmltooling, etc.) would need to use stlport.

And xml-security, xerces, and log4shib.

>Would OpenSSL and/or Apache also need to be rebuilt against stlport?  I
>don't think there's any C++ code in either of them...

No, there isn't. Or in curl.

-- Scott