<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Dumb question - is it reasonable to replace the old aggregate with the output of the new MDQ aggregates?<div><br></div><div>Yes, this means the admins won’t have to change but the federation keeps working.</div><div><br></div><div>/mrg<br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage"><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Feb 18, 2025, at 12:31, Alan Buxey via users <users@shibboleth.net> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div><div dir="auto">Hi<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Does appear that a lot of Incommon participants are still using the legacy metadata aggregate and haven't yet moved to the new metadata feed via MDQ...but that also a lot of admins are not subscribed to the Incommon operations mailing list? </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I'd suggest joining that mailing list if you are in Incommon and also visiting <a href="https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=166658430#content/view/166658430">https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=166658430#content/view/166658430</a></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Regards </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">alan</div></div>
-- <br>For Consortium Member technical support, see https://shibboleth.atlassian.net/wiki/x/ZYEpPw<br>To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>