<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi,Scott.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks to your advices, I could solve this problem!!</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:08 PM Cantor, Scott <<a href="mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu">cantor.2@osu.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 2/5/19, 8:59 AM, "users on behalf of Noriyuki TAKEI" <<a href="mailto:users-bounces@shibboleth.net" target="_blank">users-bounces@shibboleth.net</a> on behalf of <a href="mailto:ntakei@sios.com" target="_blank">ntakei@sios.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> If previous statement is missing, resolverContex generated in MFA Script affects main attribute resolution.<br>
<br>
Yes, it does. So the issue wasn't that you were trying to resolve the ImmutableID in the MFA step but that the MFA step was preventing the main step from resolving the ImmutableID.<br>
<br>
-- Scott<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
For Consortium Member technical support, see <a href="https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/x/coFAAg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/x/coFAAg</a><br>
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to <a href="mailto:users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net" target="_blank">users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div></div>