<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Liam Hoekenga <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:liamr@umich.edu" target="_blank">liamr@umich.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Anyone ever do an integration with <a href="https://www.litmos.com/" target="_blank">https://www.litmos.com/</a> ?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Can't help there.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>They want unsolicited SSO with RelayState, and they want RelayState as part of the assertion?  (I've only ever seen it as a query parameter).<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, sent to the SP in the form, typically.  Is it possible they're confused?  I recent dealt with a vendor who claimed the same thing.  I told them it wasn't possible, and that it would be non-conforming.  They came back to me that they had talked to their "SAML engineers" and that I was wrong, so I sent them the respective sections from the specifications.  At that point, they responded that they didn't really mean in the assertion.  They meant in the POSTed form.</div><div><br></div><div>Greg</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Liam</div></font></span></div>
<br>-- <br>
For Consortium Member technical support, see <a href="https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/x/coFAAg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.shibboleth.net/<wbr>confluence/x/coFAAg</a><br>
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to <a href="mailto:users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net">users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.<wbr>net</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>