<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/11/15 10:57 PM, Benji Wakely
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:TY1PR04MB07026F9203558B8EA51405F8B8120@TY1PR04MB0702.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
- Not possible to Simply load balance this and keep Attribute Query functionality.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Well, you referenced the IdPStatelessClustering page below. That
has a pointer to how to do stateless clustering with support for
attribute query using the -CryptoTransient- components (see bottom
of that page). If all you need to support is attribute query,
that's probably the preferred and easiest solution. <br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:TY1PR04MB07026F9203558B8EA51405F8B8120@TY1PR04MB0702.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> Can use Terracotta. Varying reports of Terracotta being a Pain.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, it is a Big Pain. We don't recommend it anymore, and it's not
supported in 3.x. Don't use it.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:TY1PR04MB07026F9203558B8EA51405F8B8120@TY1PR04MB0702.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
- Better option would be to use memcache as detailed below.
References / reading: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/SHIB2/IdPStatelessClustering">https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/SHIB2/IdPStatelessClustering</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/SHIB2/Memcached+StorageService">https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/SHIB2/Memcached+StorageService</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Per the above the crypto transient is the best if you can live with
the limitations of the stateless solution. If not, then I believe
many have had good results with the memcached route (I personally
can't speak to it).<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>