<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Cantor, Scott <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu" target="_blank">cantor.2@osu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":3vp" class="" style="overflow:hidden">That is certainly the most common case, though IIRC, Google (incorrectly I guess) was explicitly documenting the need for unspecified.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree that I'm pretty sure they used to.  Certainly, that's the IdP v2 config we've had since 2009.  However, while exploring the recommendation to try others, I also looked up current documentation, where they use a Format whose definition I can't find:</div><div><a href="https://support.google.com/a/answer/60224?hl=en">https://support.google.com/a/answer/60224?hl=en</a><br></div><br>I tested urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:emailAddress, which worked fine, as well as my current internally defined format.<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":3vp" class="" style="overflow:hidden"><br>
Anyway, if that's the case, people shouln't keep using unspecified. We should just define something at the community level for Google since they can't be bothered, and then the guidance we give people would be consistent.</div></blockquote></div><br>If we do so, I'd be happy to change.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Greg</div></div>