<html><head></head><body><div>Thanks much for that information Scott. I'll try corresponding with the SP more and see if we can get anywhere with that in mind.</div><div><br></div><div>Brandon McKean</div><div><br></div><div>On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 17:43 +0000, Cantor, Scott wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><pre>On 8/4/15, 1:29 PM, "users on behalf of McKean, Brandon Scott - mckeanbs" <<a href="mailto:users-bounces@shibboleth.net">users-bounces@shibboleth.net</a> on behalf of <a href="mailto:mckeanbs@jmu.edu">mckeanbs@jmu.edu</a>> wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
That makes sense, but that would make me wonder why IDPv2 had worked with it in this scenario, without any special configuration that I'm aware of.
</blockquote>
Because whatever they don't like wasn't in the V2 response.
-- Scott
</pre></blockquote></body></html>