<html><head></head><body><blockquote type="cite"><div>The differences are not minor the more I dig into the SSL files and the old example is not usable without a lot of assumptions and care.</div><div><br></div><div>I forked the page and I'm just writing up new examples.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Good to know. For what it's worth I plan on putting up another Shibboleth 3 server or two, so if you'd like feedback on the examples, I'd be happy to give them a try.</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>There are various reasons why that makes our life harder, and I'm not prepared to make that trade off.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Fair enough, perhaps a README or something in jetty-base outlining it's intended use would be in order then?</div><div><br></div><div>On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 17:33 +0000, Cantor, Scott wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><pre>On 7/22/15, 1:16 PM, "users on behalf of McKean, Brandon Scott - mckeanbs" <<a href="mailto:users-bounces@shibboleth.net">users-bounces@shibboleth.net</a> on behalf of <a href="mailto:mckeanbs@jmu.edu">mckeanbs@jmu.edu</a>> wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
To be clear, I had tried using the included jetty-base in Shibboleth initially, but then had transitioned to using what was on the wiki instead, where I still had the issue. The only solution I had found was using 9.2 instead.
</blockquote>
The differences are not minor the more I dig into the SSL files and the old example is not usable without a lot of assumptions and care.
I forked the page and I'm just writing up new examples.
<blockquote type="cite">
I think we'd be best served by removing it from the tar archive entirely if it's indeed only used for Windows, to avoid the confusion at all.
</blockquote>
There are various reasons why that makes our life harder, and I'm not prepared to make that trade off.
-- Scott
</pre></blockquote></body></html>