<div dir="ltr">My proposed example has URI for the nameFormat rather than Wiki's current "NAME_FORMAT" ,<div>so I understand you to say Scott that my example is legal while the wiki's is not<div><br><div>I was also asking whether the required attribute is <b>nameFormat</b> (as stated) or <b>nameIDFormat</b> (as in the example three lines down from the stated requirement).</div></div><div><br></div><div>David Banz</div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Cantor, Scott <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu" target="_blank">cantor.2@osu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 3/31/15, 2:50 PM, "IAM David Bantz" <<a href="mailto:dabantz@alaska.edu">dabantz@alaska.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>I'd appreciate correction or confirmation of my conjecture...<br>
<br>
</span>Legal and illegal is about it for me when it comes to examples. In that particular page, not using a URI in the example is basically wrong/invalid, so in that sense it's definitely bad.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-- Scott<br>
<br>
--<br>
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to <a href="mailto:users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net">users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>