<div dir="ltr">Thanks, Scott.  I&#39;m unclear what you meant by &quot;don&#39;t have authorization<div>support unless you don&#39;t auto-provision&quot;...  it&#39;s that double negative that&#39;s</div><div>getting me!</div><div><br></div><div>- Gary</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Cantor, Scott <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu" target="_blank">cantor.2@osu.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 10/30/14, 3:29 PM, &quot;Gary Chapman&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:gary.chapman@nyu.edu">gary.chapman@nyu.edu</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;Does this sound correct (i.e. no Box support for this approach) to those<br>
&gt;of you who&#39;ve done SSO integrations with Box?<br>
<br>
</span>Does to me. Very few vendors of that nature have any authorization support<br>
unless you don&#39;t auto-provision.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-- Scott<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to <a href="mailto:users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net">users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>