<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Cantor, Scott <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu" target="_blank">cantor.2@osu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On 7/10/14, 9:06 PM, "Nate Klingenstein" <<a href="mailto:ndk@internet2.edu">ndk@internet2.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>How on Earth did you trip over that rock? I would like to help some<br>
>others trip over it too.<br>
<br>
</div>I'd be a little leery of that if it's undocumented. Sending a NameID isn't<br>
*that* hard.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>No, it's not hard at all, but not having to send a custom NameID cuts down on the number of custom relying-party entries in my relying-party.xml. A worthy rock to trip over so long as Service-Now views this as a feature rather than a bug.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Dave</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>David Langenberg<div>Identity & Access Management</div><div>The University of Chicago</div>
</div></div>