<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We are planning to upgrade our Shib IdP infrastructure. I have some idea about this after reading the wiki and the shib-users list. Would love to hear from those who are already operating in production. Please see under Planned below.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sorry to repeat if it has been answered already.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Current operating environemnt:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">IdP - 2.3.2, Java - Oracle Java 6, Tomcat - Tomcat 6 , OS - Redhat Linux 6.0 32-bit, Clustering – Terracotta 3.2.1<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Planned:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">IdP - 2.4.0, Java - Oracle Java 7, Tomcat - Tomcat 7, OS - Redhat Linux 6.0 64-bit, Clustering – TBD. Debating whether to go stateless or use some clustering solution.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Based on my understanding…<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tomcat 7 – Client certification validation is not optimal under Tomcat 7. It should not be an issue for us, our IdP is fronted by Apache httpd anyway.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Clustering - There is no support for Terracotta DSO under Java 7. We have to use an alternate clustering solution or go Stateless which has some features limitations.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Datta<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>