On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:08 PM, William G. Thompson, Jr. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wgthom@gmail.com" target="_blank">wgthom@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>That said, I believe there are more straight forward ways to implement the behavior described for user-controlled SSO opt-out and IdP-only logout mechanism (i.e. *not* SLO).</div>
<div><br></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.666666984558105px">Unicon is willing to explore potential solutions with the community and implement them under them our Cooperative Support sustaining engineering budget.</span></font></div>
<div><br></div><div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>Bill -- thanks very much for sharing that info about the SWF related work.</div><div><br></div><div>How might we start a conversation about:</div><div><br>
</div><div>1) the community's sense of the relative value of support for "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:collapse;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">user-controlled SSO opt-out" ?</span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:collapse;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:collapse;color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">2) to explore potential solutions ?</span></div>