See ISO 8601<div><br></div><div>The dashes are optional and I believe that the time portion can be dropped if not needed.</div><div>20111215T000000 and 20111215 would both be acceptable. We've been working under</div>
<div>this interpretation.</div><div><br></div><div> - Michael<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Chad La Joie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lajoie@shibboleth.net">lajoie@shibboleth.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I'm pretty sure there isn't a different syntax; anything not present is<br>
assumed to be zero. So 2011-12-05 is technically 2011-12-05T00:00:00-0000<br>
<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
On 12/5/11 6:27 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:<br>
> I don't know what the ISO syntax is for a date alone, I haven't checked.<br>
--<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">To unsubscribe from this list send an email to <a href="mailto:users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net">users-unsubscribe@shibboleth.net</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>