xmlsectool v4.0.0 released

[Ian Young]

> On 22 Apr 2025, at 09:27, Simon Lundström via users <users at shibboleth.net> wrote:
> 
> Hey Ian!
> 
> Thanks for this!
> 
> Tried it out and works great! How ever there seems to be a slight slow
> down.

Sorry I missed this when you sent it. Thanks for reporting.


> While validating all 32 .xml-files in an IDP conf folder on this
> machine:
> # java -version
> openjdk version "17.0.14" 2025-01-21
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.14+7-Debian-1deb11u1)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.0.14+7-Debian-1deb11u1, mixed mode, sharing)

Just to clarify:

* You used the same OpenJDK deployment in both tests?
* All you’re doing is schema validation, not creating or verifying signatures?
* This is repeatable over multiple runs?
- How large are the files you’re validating?
- Where do your local schema files come from?

This seems odd, because nothing has changed in xmlsectool between the two versions that should affect that operation if you’re using the same JDK in both cases. “Should”. Famous last words. I’m sure you’re right, I just can't think off hand of what the cause might be.

    -- Ian




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20250428/f4d7c5f3/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4151 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20250428/f4d7c5f3/attachment.p7s>