Question about FailOverDataConnector

[Cantor, Scott]

> Nope, seems to work fine. If I include it in exportAttributes for both the 
> primary and fail over, like I said, it resolves attributes for both. If I include it
> in just the primary, it behaves as expected.

The case I would be a little surprised at is if the failover runs. I wouldn't have expected the exportAttributes designation at the parent connector to apply, but I don't remember the mechanics of failover enough to say.

If it works, then it probably is implemented from within the connector that "failed", so it has a chance to honor its own exportAttributes rule.

-- Scott