xmlsectool
Lohr, Donald A - lohrda
lohrda at jmu.edu
Mon Feb 12 13:48:14 UTC 2024
thx
On 2/11/2024 9:20 AM, Ian Young wrote:
>
>
>> On 9 Feb 2024, at 20:16, Lohr, Donald A - lohrda via users
>> <users at shibboleth.net> wrote:
>>
>> I'm being asked to find out why the xmlsectool utility is still at
>> v3.0.0 (last updated 2020-12-15 15:49).
>
> There hasn't been a change in its requirements or functionality, or
> any reported issues that we have felt it necessary to publish a new
> version to address.
>
> That might be surprising for a more sophisticated tool, but xmlsectool
> is very simple.
>
> The most likely thing to be done in a v4 would be to shift its
> baseline requirements to Java 17 to match the IdP but there's no real
> functional benefit to that for an application of this kind.
>
>
>> Is it considered an supported or unsupported tool?
>
> It's supported, at least on the platforms mentioned in its System
> Requirements page ([1]). In addition to that, it should work fine on
> any subsequent version of Java to date; the big change was the 8->11
> transition where the mechanism for using PKCS#11 tokens in Java
> changed in an incompatible way. Our regular internal testing runs the
> v3 trunk against Java 11, 17, 21 and 22.
>
> -- Ian
>
>
> [1]
> https://shibboleth.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/XSTJ3/pages/2369683699/System+Requirements
>
>
--
D o n a l d L o h r
I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m s
J a m e s M a d i s o n U n i v e r s i t y
5 4 0 . 5 6 8 . 3 7 3 0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20240212/3f4a9f60/attachment.htm>
More information about the users
mailing list