sp signingAlg and digestAlg defaults and setting explicit values

[Paul B. Henson]

On 8/19/2024 12:33 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:

> No. It has no concept of "better" to begin with, so there would be no
> way for it to make that sort of determination. The point of the
> extension is that it was ordered so that if somebody makes a decision
> about better and worse, it's honored.

Ah, I guess I gave that process more credit than it deserved :), I 
didn't realize it just took the first one in the list that it knew 
about. Even if that was SHA1 and the list later contained SHA256.

Thanks for the clarification.