Bomgar/BeyondTrust relying party?

Paul Engle pengle at
Mon Oct 17 19:08:55 UTC 2022

No, that's the supremely stupid thing. The attributes are mapped by name,
but it cared about the friendlyName even still. Not using it. Just looking
at it.

Paul Engle
IAM Architect
Identity & Access Management
pengle at 713-348-4702

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:28 PM Cantor, Scott via users <
users at> wrote:

> >    I’m surprised an error was based on friendlyNames; does that suggest
> > the attribute mapping that is configured in the Bomgar interface
> > requires friendlyName rather than name of the attributes I’m sending?
> It suggests that, and that's it very seriously broken of course.
> -- Scott
> --
> For Consortium Member technical support, see
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> users-unsubscribe at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <>

More information about the users mailing list