Storing persistentId using an HTTP DataConnector
spfma.tech at e.mail.fr
spfma.tech at e.mail.fr
Tue Nov 8 16:54:11 UTC 2022
Thank you and Nate. In fact, I am just a bit dumb and/or blind : I have read these pages a couple of times, edited my saml-nameid.* files even more. But if I am not able to spot "#idp.nameid.saml2.default = urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:transient", what to do ? So with "idp.nameid.saml2.default = urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:persistent" I get the expected result !
Regards Le 08-Nov-2022 16:56:13 +0100, users at shibboleth.net a crit:
* spf via users [2022-11-08 16:30]:
> The only thing I can't undersand for now is how to have a persistent
> NameID in the SAML assertions. If the SAML2PersistentGenerator only
> is enabled, there is even no subject. But if SAML2TransientGenerator
> or both are enabled, I have a
In my conf/saml-nameid.xml within I have multiple *Generator
elements, all "active" in the configuration and used when needed
(based on the NameID selection process Nate pointed you to):
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20221108/0c84ccaf/attachment.htm>
More information about the users
mailing list