Defining custom attribute names for SPs that won't map names internally

Max Spicer max.spicer at
Thu Jun 16 13:52:16 UTC 2022

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 13:21, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2 at> wrote:

On 6/16/22, 5:27 AM, "users on behalf of Max Spicer via users" <
> users-bounces at on behalf of users at> wrote:
> >    We have an SP that cannot map released attribute names to their own
> internal names.
> s/cannot/refuses to
> Obligatory: I would absolutely refuse this in the majority of cases, and I
> do that maybe 2-3 times a year.

Totally agree, but sadly it is sometimes a necessary evil.

> We generally use entity groups to group related SPs and then filter by
> entity group rather than specific SPs. Is
> > there an example of how to do this sort of thing?
> In the topic on activation conditions. Use entity attribute tags, not
> groups.

Thanks. I've now found
Moving towards tagged metadata has been on my learning list for a while.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the users mailing list