Resolving attributes from a SAML proxy

[Michael Grady]

> On Oct 6, 2021, at 3:36 PM, Wessel, Keith <kwessel at illinois.edu> wrote:
> 
> I’ll give that a shot, Mike. If I put it in the registry, I don’t need the data connector, right? Just the registry entry and the attribute filter?
>  
> Keith

It depends on why you care about "receiving it". The registry entry is sufficient  (I think) to get rid of a warning message about it in the logs, but if you want to actually base some attribute definition logic on it in the resolver, you would still need the data connector.

--
Michael A. Grady
IAM Architect, Unicon, Inc.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20211006/907d87a4/attachment.htm>