Any changes in OIDC RP overrides between V1 and V2?

[Wessel, Keith]

Thanks. I should have remembered the T separator. I knew that at one point. Thanks for the refresher.

P1Y was definitely working in IdP V3. But I'll happily change it to P365D. I agree that months and years are a bit vague.

Thanks,
Keith


-----Original Message-----
From: users <users-bounces at shibboleth.net> On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 12:32 PM
To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
Subject: Re: Any changes in OIDC RP overrides between V1 and V2?

On 3/29/21, 1:26 PM, "users on behalf of Wessel, Keith" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of kwessel at illinois.edu> wrote:

>    In that case, can I assume that just P1Y is no longer available and P#D still is?

This is ISO Duration syntax. There's nothing new or different about them in this version unless the Java itself is different. We don't do the parsing.

>    And when would one use PT versus just P?

Month/Day/Year values are before, Hour/Minute/Second is after, just as in an ISO timestamp. It's the same syntax, just a P in front of it and that some values don't represent unambiguous durations. I doubt months or years work for example.

-- Scott


-- 
For Consortium Member technical support, see https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/x/coFAAg__;!!DZ3fjg!q6L8HW-ZwxbQjdKbF9SqFLtxmvFiAsBSAJPAKBUwcQlMZBAPfYs--IUVJvvPsyNbJQ$ 
To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-unsubscribe at shibboleth.net