[External] jetty

[Spencer Thomas]

And therein lies our issue with this update.  We have many users who are in “developing nations”, and who may indeed be using old software on old hardware.  If making the change disenfranchises something like 1.6% of our users, we may be constrained by the business to not do so. We have not yet done the audit to actually know what that number is.

--
Spencer Thomas
Technical Architect / JSTOR and Artstor
ITHAKA<https://www.ithaka.org/> / 301 E. Liberty St, Suite 250, Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Email: Spencer.Thomas at ithaka.org<mailto:Spencer.Thomas at ithaka.org>
Voicemail: 734-887-7004





From: users <users-bounces at shibboleth.net> on behalf of Ian Young <ian at iay.org.uk>
Reply-To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 12:48 PM
To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
Subject: Re: [External] jetty

If you want better than B, that implies that you're giving up 1.6% of browser clients (worldwide, of all types). Interestingly, that seems to be only 0.23% of mobile browsers, it's the desktop ones from 2013 and earlier that cause the problem. Of course numbers like that are only meaningful if you know whether their sample is representative of your clients.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shibboleth.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20210318/ba54c56f/attachment.htm>