mace:shibboleth:1.0:nameIdentifier in 4.0.1 / SAML 2 ?

Cantor, Scott cantor.2 at
Fri Jan 8 17:31:44 UTC 2021

On 1/8/21, 4:02 AM, "users on behalf of Louis Chanouha" <users-bounces at on behalf of chanouha at> wrote:

>    Is there still a way to make Shibb respond to this nameid request, even with a "ugly hack" ?

Yes, but that's not something I'm going to spend my time describing as it's not a valid configuration.

>    Several external services uses this nameid, I will spend a lot of energy making every parties modify their SP.

I have never heard of anything that *needs* a transient NameID in any Format. That doesn't really make a great deal of sense.

-- Scott

More information about the users mailing list