mace:shibboleth:1.0:nameIdentifier in 4.0.1 / SAML 2 ?
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Fri Jan 8 17:31:44 UTC 2021
On 1/8/21, 4:02 AM, "users on behalf of Louis Chanouha" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of chanouha at insa-toulouse.fr> wrote:
> Is there still a way to make Shibb respond to this nameid request, even with a "ugly hack" ?
Yes, but that's not something I'm going to spend my time describing as it's not a valid configuration.
> Several external services uses this nameid, I will spend a lot of energy making every parties modify their SP.
I have never heard of anything that *needs* a transient NameID in any Format. That doesn't really make a great deal of sense.
More information about the users