Attribute Transcoding errors following IdP upgrade

Cantor, Scott cantor.2 at osu.edu
Tue Sep 22 14:25:22 UTC 2020


On 9/22/20, 10:19 AM, "users on behalf of Simon McLeish" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of simon.mcleish at gmail.com> wrote:

>    Wouldn't those rules be expected to work the same in 3.4.6 and 4.0.1?

If you mean to encode attributes outbound, yes, those will work as is the same as they did before, provided it's loading the resolver file into the registry service's configuration set.

-- Scott




More information about the users mailing list