Attribute Transcoding errors following IdP upgrade
Cantor, Scott
cantor.2 at osu.edu
Tue Sep 22 14:25:22 UTC 2020
On 9/22/20, 10:19 AM, "users on behalf of Simon McLeish" <users-bounces at shibboleth.net on behalf of simon.mcleish at gmail.com> wrote:
> Wouldn't those rules be expected to work the same in 3.4.6 and 4.0.1?
If you mean to encode attributes outbound, yes, those will work as is the same as they did before, provided it's loading the resolver file into the registry service's configuration set.
-- Scott
More information about the users
mailing list