Ex: RE: cas proxy auth - SAML equivalent?

[Paul B. Henson]

> From: Cantor, Scott
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 5:45 AM
>
> Similar functionality, yes, but it requires complex client code to use, and you
> wouldn't have any of it in the applications you need to support. We formally
> deprecated it in V4, but haven't officially decided whether to remove it yet.

Well, that doesn't sound very promising 8-/, but thanks for the info.

> I am interested in trying to fix the dependency on server-side storage for
> CAS proxying. I don't see any reason it needs to be there. The tickets should
> ideally be able to carry the information needed, and recursion shouldn't
> change that.

On the other hand, I never considered that the requirement for server-side storage for CAS proxy tickets was simply because no one had ever updated that code to use the client-side storage. I'll poke around that part of the code and see what I can make of it.

Thanks again...