I love reloadable services

[Joseph Fischetti]

So not that you're considering getting rid of the ability to reload services, but rather, you don't see the benefit to making other services reloadable going forward?

If that's the case, I can understand that.  The current functionality make it easy to do most standard administrative tasks live (adding service providers, changing attribute resolution/release, etc).

I'll see if I can find the original thread to catch up on what the actual request was.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users <users-bounces at shibboleth.net> On Behalf Of Cantor, Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 9:13 AM
> To: Shib Users <users at shibboleth.net>
> Subject: RE: I love reloadable services
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> > I’m curious what the context of the comment was.
>
> I was asked about making something reloadable that wasn't very practical to
> do, and I alluded to the fact that people are operating the software these
> days in ways that are somewhat counter to the software's orignal design
> philosophy (i.e. everything about Docker), and that that was neutering a lot
> of the intended advantages of the reloadability features.
>
> -- Scott
>
> --
> For Consortium Member technical support, see
> https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/x/coFAAg
> To unsubscribe from this list send an email to users-
> unsubscribe at shibboleth.net